Map of the Samana Cay route (Judge 1986) | |
---|---|
![]() |
Samana Cay is a small island lying north of Acklins Island in the central Bahamas. The Samana Cay theory was first proposed in 1882 by Gustavus V. Fox, a former Undersecretary of the Navy. The theory fell into disrepute when it was severely criticized by James B. Murdock in 1884. (Fox had died in 1883 and was unable to rebut Murdock's views.) Murdock's major criticism was that in Fox's track to Fortune Island (the theory's Island IV), Columbus returned to a point within sight of Crooked Island (Island II). Murdock argued that Columbus couldn't have backtracked without specifically mentioning it in the log. This was a convincing line of reasoning that held sway for a century.
The Samana theory was revived by Joseph Judge in the pages of National Geographic (November 1986), and has since enjoyed a resurgence in popularity. Ironically, Judge did not deal with Murdock's 'Columbus couldn't have returned' argument at all; indeed, Judge didn't even mention the argument in his article. However, another Samana advocate, Alejandro Perez, later found persuasive evidence that refuted Murdock's view: see Las Casas' Historia on the clues page.
The Samana theory route: Island I = Samana Cay; Island II = Crooked-Acklins; Island III = Long Island; Island IV = Fortune Island. The list of problems here is satisfyingly short, indicating that Samana Cay is one of the better theories around.
Landsat image of Samana Cay | |
---|---|
![]() | |
The quote:
"It is impossible to explain the facts at our disposal in any other way. The solution to the mystery is Samana Cay."
-- Joseph Judge, Senior Editor, National Geographic
Return to the Landfall Homepage